The video clip that we watched was about the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001. This video used the angle of vision strategy we read about in Chapter 3. The filmmakers wanted to show the possible corruption that could have occured that day and wanted their audience to question the government. They used the angle of vision to raise awareness about this topic to the general public. Throughout the video they use the rhetorical aims, pathos, logos, a nd ethos, that we talked about. I think the video definitely could have influenced some people's minds about this horrific day, but if you really look into the information that they provided there seems to be many flaws.
The filmmakers throughout the movie use many eye witnesses and sources that definitely could be questioned. They definitely showed their side of the arguement but they also used unrelated evidence that had nothing to do with the events that occured at all. I think that since they have made many different versions of this event, they should have eliminated many of the flaws that they had in this video.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment